PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWET vs. GEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWET vs. GEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 968.33% return, which is significantly higher than GEL's -6.65% return.


BWET

1D
-5.48%
1M
18.43%
YTD
968.33%
6M
944.72%
1Y
1,424.52%
3Y*
123.86%
5Y*
10Y*

GEL

1D
0.35%
1M
-11.87%
YTD
-6.65%
6M
-8.64%
1Y
-10.90%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
-2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWET vs. GEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
968.33%96.22%-39.21%14.13%
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
-6.65%61.77%-8.37%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BWET and GEL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWET vs. GEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GEL
GEL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEL Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWET vs. GEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWETGELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+15.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

0.96

+0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

47.03

-0.49

+47.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

147.28

-1.34

+148.62

BWET vs. GEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWET Sharpe Ratio is 14.65, which is higher than the GEL Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWET and GEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BWET vs. GEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum GEL drawdown of -91.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and GEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWETGELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-91.63%

+34.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.64%

-22.50%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.81%

-31.46%

-25.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.48%

-41.75%

+36.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.76%

-34.14%

+10.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.60%

8.17%

+3.43%

Volatility

BWET vs. GEL - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 26.27% compared to Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) at 10.28%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWETGELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.27%

10.28%

+15.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.01%

18.60%

+70.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.57%

28.37%

+70.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.47%

41.21%

+29.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.47%

51.23%

+19.24%

Dividends

BWET vs. GEL - Dividend Comparison

BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
4.84%4.23%6.08%5.18%5.88%5.60%16.10%10.74%11.37%11.87%7.54%6.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


BWET and GEL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWET has higher volatility (26.27%) compared to GEL (10.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWET dropped -56.90% vs GEL's -91.63%.

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWET and GEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer