PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BW vs. TSEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BW vs. TSEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BW achieves a 50.81% return, which is significantly lower than TSEM's 87.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BW has underperformed TSEM with an annualized return of -24.05%, while TSEM has yielded a comparatively higher 32.18% annualized return.


BW

1D
-1.58%
1M
-20.61%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
50.81%
1Y
925.04%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
-24.05%
ALL TIME*
-23.82%

TSEM

1D
4.03%
1M
0.28%
6M
63.04%
YTD
87.08%
1Y
391.76%
3Y*
79.58%
5Y*
51.14%
10Y*
32.18%
ALL TIME*
0.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.60M$37.10M$59.24M
$339.52M$421.97M$502.55M

BW vs. TSEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BW
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
50.81%286.59%12.33%-74.70%-36.03%156.98%-3.57%-6.76%-93.13%-65.76%
TSEM
Tower Semiconductor Ltd
87.08%127.96%68.77%-29.35%8.87%53.68%7.32%63.23%-56.75%79.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BW and TSEM is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.26

The correlation between BW and TSEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BW:

$1.07B

TSEM:

$24.55B

EPS

BW:

-$0.79

TSEM:

$2.15

PS Ratio

BW:

1.67

TSEM:

15.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

BW:

$668.48M

TSEM:

$1.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BW:

$121.68M

TSEM:

$401.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

BW:

-$41.40M

TSEM:

$571.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BW vs. TSEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BW
BW Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

TSEM
TSEM Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TSEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BW vs. TSEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWTSEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.53

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.26

9.41

+4.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.23

33.95

+10.27

BW vs. TSEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BW Sharpe Ratio is 6.89, which is higher than the TSEM Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BW and TSEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BW vs. TSEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BW drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, roughly equal to the maximum TSEM drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BW and TSEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWTSEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.89%

-99.75%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.72%

-40.72%

-22.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.33%

-45.83%

-49.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.39%

-55.39%

-42.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.85%

-62.28%

-37.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.96%

-63.28%

-32.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.94%

-85.27%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.18%

11.26%

+8.92%

Volatility

BW vs. TSEM - Volatility Comparison

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Tower Semiconductor Ltd (TSEM) have volatilities of 31.34% and 30.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWTSEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.34%

30.62%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.95%

65.57%

+23.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.11%

76.83%

+53.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

111.10%

49.90%

+61.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.62%

45.00%

+63.62%

Dividends

BW vs. TSEM - Dividend Comparison

BW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while TSEM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Financials

BW vs. TSEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and Tower Semiconductor Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BW vs. TSEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and Tower Semiconductor Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TSEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a gross profit of 110.95M and revenue of 413.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

BW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of -79.62M and revenue of 214.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.1%.

TSEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported an operating income of 64.57M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

BW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of -80.66M and revenue of 214.41M, resulting in a net margin of -37.6%.

TSEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tower Semiconductor Ltd reported a net income of 65.03M and revenue of 413.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BW and TSEM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BW has higher volatility (31.34%) compared to TSEM (30.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BW dropped -99.89% vs TSEM's -99.75%.

BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.89 vs 4.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BW and TSEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer