PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BW vs. INTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BW vs. INTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Intel Corporation (INTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BW achieves a 181.24% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 263.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BW has underperformed INTC with an annualized return of -21.69%, while INTC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.


BW

1D
1.28%
1M
-13.19%
YTD
181.24%
6M
263.89%
1Y
1,734.03%
3Y*
40.20%
5Y*
18.91%
10Y*
-21.69%

INTC

1D
10.64%
1M
13.07%
YTD
263.12%
6M
263.91%
1Y
535.63%
3Y*
55.49%
5Y*
21.34%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BW vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BW
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
181.24%286.59%12.33%-74.70%-36.03%156.98%-3.57%-6.76%-93.13%-65.76%
INTC
Intel Corporation
263.12%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%30.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BW and INTC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.24

The correlation between BW and INTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BW:

$2.32B

INTC:

$681.07B

EPS

BW:

-$0.83

INTC:

-$0.67

PS Ratio

BW:

2.97

INTC:

11.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

BW:

$668.48M

INTC:

$53.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BW:

$121.68M

INTC:

$19.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

BW:

-$41.40M

INTC:

$8.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BW vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BW
BW Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BW Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BW Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BW Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BW vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWINTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.68

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

53.79

21.85

+31.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

143.36

51.04

+92.32

BW vs. INTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BW Sharpe Ratio is 14.37, which is higher than the INTC Sharpe Ratio of 7.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BW and INTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BW vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BW drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than INTC's maximum drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BW and INTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWINTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.89%

-82.25%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.71%

-24.17%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.93%

-63.80%

-32.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.39%

-65.53%

-31.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.87%

-70.80%

-29.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.46%

0.00%

-92.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.81%

-36.65%

-46.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.62%

10.33%

+2.29%

Volatility

BW vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) is 24.70%, while Intel Corporation (INTC) has a volatility of 27.04%. This indicates that BW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWINTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.70%

27.04%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.58%

59.65%

+28.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

126.28%

74.86%

+51.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.21%

52.68%

+57.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.24%

44.42%

+63.82%

Dividends

BW vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison

BW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BW
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%

Financials

BW vs. INTC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and Intel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
214.41M
13.58B
(BW) Total Revenue
(INTC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BW vs. INTC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and Intel Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
39.4%
Portfolio components
BW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

INTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.35B and revenue of 13.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

BW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of -79.62M and revenue of 214.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.1%.

INTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of -3.14B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.1%.

BW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of -80.66M and revenue of 214.41M, resulting in a net margin of -37.6%.

INTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -3.73B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in a net margin of -27.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BW and INTC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTC has higher volatility (27.04%) compared to BW (24.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BW dropped -99.89% vs INTC's -82.25%.

BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.37 vs 7.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BW and INTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer