PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BW vs. HUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BW vs. HUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BW having a 169.10% return and HUT slightly lower at 164.43%.


BW

1D
1.84%
1M
-21.92%
YTD
169.10%
6M
223.12%
1Y
1,524.86%
3Y*
38.15%
5Y*
16.89%
10Y*
-22.04%

HUT

1D
1.08%
1M
18.55%
YTD
164.43%
6M
229.66%
1Y
558.07%
3Y*
119.42%
5Y*
44.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BW vs. HUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BW
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
169.10%286.59%12.33%-74.70%-36.03%156.98%-3.57%-6.76%-93.44%
HUT
Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock
164.43%124.21%53.60%213.88%-89.17%185.45%250.63%-25.02%-70.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BW and HUT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018

0.25

The correlation between BW and HUT shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BW:

$2.22B

HUT:

$13.49B

EPS

BW:

-$0.83

HUT:

-$2.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

BW:

$668.48M

HUT:

-$40.96M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BW:

$121.68M

HUT:

-$132.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

BW:

-$41.40M

HUT:

-$306.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BW vs. HUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BW
BW Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BW Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BW Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

HUT
HUT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BW vs. HUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWHUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.49

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

45.77

14.58

+31.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

123.06

39.80

+83.26

BW vs. HUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BW Sharpe Ratio is 12.19, which is higher than the HUT Sharpe Ratio of 5.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BW and HUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BW vs. HUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BW drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than HUT's maximum drawdown of -95.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BW and HUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWHUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.89%

-95.04%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.71%

-38.62%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.03%

-71.68%

-24.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.39%

-95.04%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.79%

-8.68%

-84.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-63.49%

-19.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.60%

14.18%

-1.58%

Volatility

BW vs. HUT - Volatility Comparison

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) have volatilities of 25.47% and 25.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWHUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.47%

25.85%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.10%

75.58%

+13.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

126.60%

103.11%

+23.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.23%

105.56%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.28%

114.69%

-6.41%

Dividends

BW vs. HUT - Dividend Comparison

BW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while HUT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Financials

BW vs. HUT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-300.00M-200.00M-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
214.41M
71.02M
(BW) Total Revenue
(HUT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BW and HUT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUT has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to BW (25.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BW dropped -99.89% vs HUT's -95.04%.

BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.19 vs 5.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BW and HUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer