BW vs. GGLL
BW (Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.) is a stock, while GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). Over the past 3 years, BW returned 46.96%/yr vs 65.97%/yr for GGLL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BW vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BW achieves a 178.86% return, which is significantly higher than GGLL's 22.24% return.
BW
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 17.24%
- YTD
- 178.86%
- 6M
- 174.96%
- 1Y
- 2,004.76%
- 3Y*
- 46.96%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- -22.27%
GGLL
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -13.22%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 293.20%
- 3Y*
- 65.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BW vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 178.86% | 286.59% | 12.33% | -74.70% | -28.14% |
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares | 22.24% | 123.07% | 48.88% | 81.20% | -30.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BW and GGLL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BW vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank
BW
GGLL
BW vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BW | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.60 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 58.85 | 7.69 | +51.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 135.77 | 26.53 | +109.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BW | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19 | 5.07 | +9.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 0.99 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
BW vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BW drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BW and GGLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BW | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -52.81% | -47.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.50% | -38.39% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.03% | -52.81% | -43.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.53% | -21.02% | -71.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -15.17% | -67.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.93% | 11.11% | +3.82% |
Volatility
BW vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) has a higher volatility of 34.66% compared to Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) at 16.60%. This indicates that BW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BW | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.66% | 16.60% | +18.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.70% | 40.70% | +49.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 143.20% | 58.40% | +84.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.03% | 56.03% | +54.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.14% | 56.03% | +52.11% |
Dividends
BW vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison
BW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares | 3.73% | 4.16% | 3.29% | 2.05% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BW and GGLL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BW has higher volatility (34.66%) compared to GGLL (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BW dropped -99.89% vs GGLL's -52.81%.
BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.19 vs 5.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BW and GGLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer