BVAL vs. RMRC

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) and RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BVAL charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RMRC.

Performance

BVAL vs. RMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BVAL

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.94%
• 6M: 10.38%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 1Y: 22.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMRC

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAL vs. RMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	8.24%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and RMRC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.81

Return for Risk

BVAL vs. RMRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVAL

BVAL Risk / Return Rank: 84
BVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

RMRC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAL vs. RMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BVAL	RMRC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.83	—	—

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. RMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, roughly equal to the maximum RMRC drawdown of -6.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and RMRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BVAL	RMRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-6.57%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.55%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-1.66%	+0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BVAL	RMRC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	10.26%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.20%	10.26%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.20%	10.26%	-0.06%

BVAL vs. RMRC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RMRC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BVAL vs. RMRC - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than RMRC's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF	1.32%	0.73%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	0.58%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BVAL and RMRC in my portfolio?

BVAL and RMRC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BVAL or RMRC?

On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BVAL or RMRC?

BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RMRC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BVAL or RMRC?

BVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.58% for RMRC.

What is the main difference between BVAL and RMRC?

BVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RMRC is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.60% for RMRC.