PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUZZ vs. QWLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 9.39% return.


BUZZ

1D
-0.57%
1M
-8.56%
6M
0.48%
YTD
2.25%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
23.70%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.15%

QWLD

1D
0.22%
1M
1.63%
6M
6.46%
YTD
9.39%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
11.57%
ALL TIME*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.29M$2.53M$3.61M
$231.12K$297.84K$1.04M

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
2.25%30.61%33.74%54.64%-47.67%-4.47%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
9.39%17.93%14.44%19.59%-13.30%20.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and QWLD is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021

0.67

The correlation between BUZZ and QWLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUZZ
QWLD

Technology

52.6%
24.9%

Financial Services

12.3%
16.5%

Communication Services

12.2%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
6.3%

Healthcare

5.4%
13.2%

Industrials

2.7%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
8.1%

Utilities

0.6%
3.8%

Energy

0.4%
3.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

BUZZ
52.6%
QWLD
24.9%

Financial Services

BUZZ
12.3%
QWLD
16.5%

Communication Services

BUZZ
12.2%
QWLD
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BUZZ
11.8%
QWLD
6.3%

Healthcare

BUZZ
5.4%
QWLD
13.2%

Industrials

BUZZ
2.7%
QWLD
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

BUZZ
2.0%
QWLD
8.1%

Utilities

BUZZ
0.6%
QWLD
3.8%

Energy

BUZZ
0.4%
QWLD
3.4%

Basic Materials

BUZZ
0.3%
QWLD
2.5%

Real Estate

BUZZ

-

QWLD
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUZZ
BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

QWLD
QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUZZQWLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.34

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

2.44

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

10.67

-10.45

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than QWLD's maximum drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and QWLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUZZQWLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-31.89%

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-7.66%

-22.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-12.40%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.87%

-22.84%

-34.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.58%

0.00%

-18.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.65%

-3.66%

-19.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.58%

1.75%

+11.83%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) has a higher volatility of 11.15% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that BUZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUZZQWLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.15%

2.30%

+8.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.46%

7.73%

+18.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.46%

9.71%

+24.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.57%

13.51%

+20.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.98%

15.12%

+17.86%

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUZZ vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.52%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
1.79%1.85%1.74%1.78%2.02%1.77%1.77%2.13%2.33%2.73%2.22%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUZZ and QWLD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUZZ has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to QWLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

On 5-year performance, QWLD leads with 10.03% vs 5.79% for BUZZ. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 5.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for BUZZ.

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.

BUZZ tracks BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for BUZZ and 0.30% for QWLD.

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUZZ and QWLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer