BUZZ vs. CGGG
BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) and CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BUZZ is passively managed, while CGGG is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGGG.
Performance
BUZZ vs. CGGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly higher than CGGG's 2.00% return.
BUZZ
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 14.04%
- YTD
- 22.01%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 44.51%
- 3Y*
- 36.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
CGGG
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUZZ vs. CGGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF | 22.01% | 8.34% |
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 2.00% | 10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUZZ and CGGG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUZZ vs. CGGG — Risk / Return Rank
BUZZ
CGGG
BUZZ vs. CGGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUZZ | CGGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUZZ | CGGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.78 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
BUZZ vs. CGGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than CGGG's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and CGGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUZZ | CGGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.87% | -17.75% | -39.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -1.98% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -3.80% | -20.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.55% | — | — |
Volatility
BUZZ vs. CGGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUZZ | CGGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.35% | 17.50% | +13.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 17.50% | +15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 17.50% | +15.19% |
BUZZ vs. CGGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CGGG's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUZZ vs. CGGG - Dividend Comparison
BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.40% |
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUZZ and CGGG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BUZZ.
CGGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 0.39% for CGGG.
Find the right allocation for BUZZ and CGGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer