BUZZ vs. CGGG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG).

BUZZ and CGGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUZZ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index. It was launched on Mar 2, 2021. CGGG is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jun 24, 2025.

Performance

BUZZ vs. CGGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BUZZ vs. CGGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	-11.23%	8.34%
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	-10.55%	10.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a -11.23% return, which is significantly lower than CGGG's -10.55% return.

BUZZ

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -7.21%
• YTD: -11.23%
• 6M: -21.35%
• 1Y: 27.46%
• 3Y*: 25.00%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: —

CGGG

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: -10.55%
• 6M: -10.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. CGGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CGGG's 0.39% expense ratio.

BUZZ

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

CGGG

Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. CGGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ

BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. CGGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUZZ	CGGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUZZ	CGGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	-0.09	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and CGGG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BUZZ vs. CGGG - Dividend Comparison

BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.52%	0.40%
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.08%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. CGGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than CGGG's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and CGGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUZZ	CGGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.87%	-17.75%	-39.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.33%	-13.78%	-12.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	-3.71%	-20.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUZZ	CGGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.93%	17.44%	+18.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.76%	17.44%	+15.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.75%	17.44%	+15.31%