BUZZ vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUZZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. BUZZ is passively managed, while BAMU is actively managed. Over the past year, BUZZ returned 28.24% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. BUZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

BUZZ vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUZZ achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

BUZZ

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 28.24%
• 3Y*: 32.73%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUZZ vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	12.47%	30.61%	33.74%	25.25%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BUZZ and BAMU is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between BUZZ and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BUZZ vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUZZ

BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 23
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUZZ vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUZZ	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	4.94	-4.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	8.71	-7.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	2.41	-1.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	24.37	-23.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.23	96.52	-94.30

BUZZ vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUZZ and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUZZ vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUZZ drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUZZ and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUZZ	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.87%	-0.36%	-56.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.47%	-0.12%	-30.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.44%	0.00%	-10.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.84%	-0.02%	-23.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.71%	0.03%	+12.68%

Volatility

BUZZ vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that BUZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUZZ	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.36%	0.09%	+12.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.02%	0.39%	+24.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.91%	0.58%	+32.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.30%	0.87%	+32.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.91%	0.87%	+32.04%

BUZZ vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUZZ vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%	0.00%
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.52%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUZZ and BAMU in my portfolio?

BUZZ and BAMU have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUZZ or BAMU?

BUZZ has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUZZ dropped -56.87% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, BUZZ or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BUZZ leads with 28.24% vs 2.87% for BAMU. On fees, BUZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUZZ or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BUZZ has performed better with a 28.24% return vs 2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUZZ or BAMU?

BUZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUZZ or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.

What is the main difference between BUZZ and BAMU?

BUZZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BUZZ and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.