PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUYW vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUYW vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYW achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.78% return.


BUYW

1D
0.28%
1M
0.92%
YTD
3.68%
6M
4.93%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
0.03%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.56%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYW vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
3.68%9.08%9.82%12.80%1.46%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
1.78%4.60%15.18%4.22%-4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYW and XRMI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022

0.46

BUYW vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUYW
XRMI

Technology

24.0%
35.6%

Communication Services

16.9%
11.2%

Financial Services

15.3%
11.8%

Energy

13.6%
3.5%

Healthcare

13.0%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
10.2%

Industrials

4.4%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.9%

Utilities

1.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.9%

Technology

BUYW
24.0%
XRMI
35.6%

Communication Services

BUYW
16.9%
XRMI
11.2%

Financial Services

BUYW
15.3%
XRMI
11.8%

Energy

BUYW
13.6%
XRMI
3.5%

Healthcare

BUYW
13.0%
XRMI
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BUYW
6.4%
XRMI
10.2%

Industrials

BUYW
4.4%
XRMI
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

BUYW
3.2%
XRMI
4.9%

Utilities

BUYW
1.3%
XRMI
2.4%

Basic Materials

BUYW
1.0%
XRMI
1.8%

Real Estate

BUYW
1.0%
XRMI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUYW vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYW vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUYWXRMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

1.91

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.37

7.73

+13.63

BUYW vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYW Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYW and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUYWXRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.79

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.37

+0.80

Drawdowns

BUYW vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYW drawdown since its inception was -9.36%, smaller than the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYW and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUYWXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-15.31%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-5.02%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-8.34%

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.17%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-5.93%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

1.23%

-0.75%

Volatility

BUYW vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 0.86%. This indicates that BUYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUYWXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.86%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

4.21%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85%

5.36%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

6.90%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

6.90%

+1.57%

BUYW vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYW has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUYW vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

BUYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than XRMI's 12.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.89%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.61%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUYW and XRMI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUYW has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to XRMI (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYW dropped -9.36% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

On 3-year performance, BUYW leads with 8.75% vs 6.74% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BUYW has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 6.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.61%, compared with 5.89% for BUYW.

They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BUYW and 0.60% for XRMI.

BUYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUYW and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer