PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUYW vs. HYGW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUYW vs. HYGW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYW achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly higher than HYGW's 2.68% return.


BUYW

1D
0.28%
1M
0.64%
6M
4.41%
YTD
5.08%
1Y
9.35%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.97%

HYGW

1D
0.31%
1M
0.35%
6M
2.13%
YTD
2.68%
1Y
6.23%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.71M$4.95M$4.82M
$507.28K$613.90K$793.25K

BUYW vs. HYGW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.08%9.08%9.82%12.80%1.94%
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
2.68%6.19%6.99%7.31%-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYW and HYGW is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2022

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUYW vs. HYGW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGW
HYGW Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HYGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUYW vs. HYGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUYWHYGWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

3.44

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.32

15.37

+3.95

BUYW vs. HYGW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYW Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the HYGW Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYW and HYGW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUYW vs. HYGW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYW drawdown since its inception was -9.36%, which is greater than HYGW's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYW and HYGW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUYWHYGWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-5.49%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-1.82%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

-3.42%

-5.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-0.59%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.41%

+0.08%

Volatility

BUYW vs. HYGW - Volatility Comparison

Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) at 0.86%. This indicates that BUYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUYWHYGWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

0.86%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

2.34%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.87%

2.94%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

4.62%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

4.62%

+3.71%

BUYW vs. HYGW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYW has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGW's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUYW vs. HYGW - Dividend Comparison

BUYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, less than HYGW's 10.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.90%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%
HYGW
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
10.67%12.53%12.30%15.98%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUYW and HYGW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUYW has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to HYGW (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYW dropped -9.36% vs HYGW's -5.49%.

On 3-year performance, BUYW leads with 8.88% vs 5.49% for HYGW. On fees, HYGW is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BUYW has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYGW is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 10.67%, compared with 5.90% for BUYW.

They also come from different issuers: Main and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BUYW and 0.69% for HYGW.

HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUYW and HYGW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer