BUR vs. RM
BUR (Burford Capital Ltd) and RM (Regional Management Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BUR in Asset Management, RM in Credit Services. Over the past 10 years, BUR returned -0.33%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for RM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BUR vs. RM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUR achieves a -51.03% return, which is significantly lower than RM's -10.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BUR has underperformed RM with an annualized return of -0.33%, while RM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.
BUR
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- -16.96%
- YTD
- -51.03%
- 6M
- -54.21%
- 1Y
- -65.86%
- 3Y*
- -30.61%
- 5Y*
- -17.20%
- 10Y*
- -0.33%
RM
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- -10.08%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 32.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- -2.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
BUR vs. RM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUR Burford Capital Ltd | -51.03% | -29.24% | -17.52% | 93.24% | -21.63% | 10.98% | 3.09% | -52.91% | 35.14% | 128.53% |
RM Regional Management Corp. | -10.08% | 18.11% | 41.51% | -6.63% | -49.62% | 96.32% | 0.26% | 24.86% | -8.59% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUR and RM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2015 | 0.22 |
The correlation between BUR and RM shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BUR:
$0.39
RM:
$4.93
BUR:
11.11
RM:
6.94
BUR:
0.03
RM:
0.52
BUR:
2.57
RM:
0.51
BUR:
$371.23M
RM:
$659.90M
BUR:
$262.56M
RM:
$430.02M
BUR:
$153.92M
RM:
$117.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUR vs. RM — Risk / Return Rank
BUR
RM
BUR vs. RM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burford Capital Ltd (BUR) and Regional Management Corp. (RM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUR | RM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.17 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 1.05 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | 2.01 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUR | RM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.92 | 0.81 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | -0.07 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | 0.20 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.15 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BUR vs. RM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUR drawdown since its inception was -86.92%, which is greater than RM's maximum drawdown of -71.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUR and RM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUR | RM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.92% | -71.80% | -15.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.66% | -31.05% | -41.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.95% | -38.09% | -36.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.95% | -64.63% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.92% | -71.80% | -15.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.63% | -35.96% | -46.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -33.67% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.60% | 16.15% | +23.45% |
Volatility
BUR vs. RM - Volatility Comparison
Burford Capital Ltd (BUR) has a higher volatility of 17.99% compared to Regional Management Corp. (RM) at 10.14%. This indicates that BUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUR | RM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.99% | 10.14% | +7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.52% | 30.28% | +44.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.47% | 40.13% | +31.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.03% | 41.70% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.39% | 45.86% | +12.53% |
Dividends
BUR vs. RM - Dividend Comparison
BUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than RM's 3.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUR Burford Capital Ltd | 2.90% | 1.40% | 0.98% | 0.80% | 1.53% | 1.78% | 0.00% |
RM Regional Management Corp. | 3.50% | 3.10% | 3.53% | 4.78% | 4.27% | 1.65% | 0.67% |
Financials
BUR vs. RM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Burford Capital Ltd and Regional Management Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BUR vs. RM - Profitability Comparison
BUR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Burford Capital Ltd reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 69.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.9%.
RM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 167.29M and revenue of 167.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BUR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Burford Capital Ltd reported an operating income of 24.79M and revenue of 69.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.5%.
RM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported an operating income of 37.76M and revenue of 167.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.
BUR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Burford Capital Ltd reported a net income of -20.27M and revenue of 69.80M, resulting in a net margin of -29.0%.
RM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 167.29M, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BUR and RM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUR has higher volatility (17.99%) compared to RM (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUR dropped -86.92% vs RM's -71.80%.
RM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUR and RM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer