BUR vs. QQQM
BUR (Burford Capital Ltd) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, BUR returned -16.67%/yr vs 17.94%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BUR vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUR achieves a -49.44% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.73% return.
BUR
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -13.44%
- YTD
- -49.44%
- 6M
- -50.87%
- 1Y
- -64.42%
- 3Y*
- -29.66%
- 5Y*
- -16.67%
- 10Y*
- -0.01%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 20.73%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 28.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- —
BUR vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUR Burford Capital Ltd | -49.44% | -29.24% | -17.52% | 93.24% | -21.63% | 10.98% | -7.90% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 20.73% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUR and QQQM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUR vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
BUR
QQQM
BUR vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burford Capital Ltd (BUR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.44 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 3.43 | -4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | 13.15 | -14.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 2.58 | -3.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.81 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.84 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
BUR vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUR drawdown since its inception was -86.92%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUR and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.92% | -35.04% | -51.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.66% | -11.96% | -60.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.95% | -22.70% | -52.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.95% | -35.04% | -39.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.07% | -0.75% | -81.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -8.24% | -31.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.84% | 3.11% | +36.73% |
Volatility
BUR vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Burford Capital Ltd (BUR) has a higher volatility of 18.45% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.51%. This indicates that BUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.45% | 4.51% | +13.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.62% | 12.06% | +62.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.54% | 15.91% | +55.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.05% | 22.23% | +28.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.39% | 22.11% | +36.28% |
Dividends
BUR vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
BUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than QQQM's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUR Burford Capital Ltd | 2.81% | 1.40% | 0.98% | 0.80% | 1.53% | 1.78% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUR and QQQM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUR has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to QQQM (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUR dropped -86.92% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUR and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer