BULZ vs. QQXL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL).

BULZ and QQXL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021. QQXL is an actively managed fund by ProShares. It was launched on Aug 13, 2025.

Performance

BULZ vs. QQXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BULZ vs. QQXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	-28.68%	23.90%
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30	-12.08%	8.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a -28.68% return, which is significantly lower than QQXL's -12.08% return.

BULZ

• 1D: 5.23%
• 1M: -12.77%
• YTD: -28.68%
• 6M: -31.57%
• 1Y: 72.81%
• 3Y*: 59.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQXL

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -7.39%
• YTD: -12.08%
• 6M: -10.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULZ vs. QQXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BULZ and QQXL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

BULZ

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN

QQXL

ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30

Return for Risk

BULZ vs. QQXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BULZ vs. QQXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BULZ	QQXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.83	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BULZ	QQXL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	-0.19	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BULZ and QQXL is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BULZ vs. QQXL - Dividend Comparison

BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.

	TTM	2025
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30	0.73%	0.08%

Drawdowns

BULZ vs. QQXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than QQXL's maximum drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and QQXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BULZ	QQXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.44%	-27.34%	-67.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.52%	-19.73%	-26.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.15%	-7.69%	-52.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BULZ	QQXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.48%	36.70%	+55.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.56%	36.70%	+54.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.56%	36.70%	+54.86%