PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BULZ vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BULZ vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 100.89% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 559.14% return.


BULZ

1D
-3.69%
1M
48.46%
YTD
100.89%
6M
88.97%
1Y
258.75%
3Y*
102.20%
5Y*
10Y*

KORU

1D
-2.29%
1M
92.47%
YTD
559.14%
6M
689.29%
1Y
2,160.10%
3Y*
132.56%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*
19.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULZ vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BULZ
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
100.89%60.09%54.09%394.22%-92.26%12.62%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
559.14%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BULZ and KORU is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021

0.59

The correlation between BULZ and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

BULZ vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BULZ
KORU

Technology

62.3%
52.3%

Communication Services

25.0%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
5.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.8%

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

16.7%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Industrials

-

20.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

BULZ
62.3%
KORU
52.3%

Communication Services

BULZ
25.0%
KORU
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BULZ
12.8%
KORU
5.8%

Basic Materials

BULZ

-

KORU
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

BULZ

-

KORU
1.8%

Energy

BULZ

-

KORU
1.4%

Financial Services

BULZ

-

KORU
16.7%

Healthcare

BULZ

-

KORU
3.5%

Industrials

BULZ

-

KORU
20.4%

Real Estate

BULZ

-

KORU

-

Utilities

BULZ

-

KORU
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BULZ vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULZ
BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BULZ vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BULZKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.72

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

35.65

-30.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.88

112.99

-100.11

BULZ vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 17.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULZ and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BULZKORUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51

17.63

-14.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.13

+0.06

Drawdowns

BULZ vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, roughly equal to the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BULZKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-95.79%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.22%

-61.39%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.96%

-73.71%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.35%

-5.39%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.42%

-57.53%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.19%

19.33%

+0.86%

Volatility

BULZ vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) is 22.49%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.18%. This indicates that BULZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BULZKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.49%

60.18%

-37.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.86%

110.71%

-53.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.35%

124.15%

-49.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.23%

85.11%

+6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.23%

79.91%

+11.32%

BULZ vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BULZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BULZ vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KORU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BULZ
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.14%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


BULZ and KORU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (60.18%) compared to BULZ (22.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULZ dropped -94.44% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 3-year performance, KORU leads with 132.56% vs 102.20% for BULZ. On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BULZ has been the lower-risk option at 22.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, KORU has performed better with a 132.56% return vs 102.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.

KORU has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation, while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BULZ and 1.29% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.63 vs 3.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BULZ and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer