BULZ vs. KORU
BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) and KORU (Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BULZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation while KORU tracks the MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BULZ returned 102.20%/yr vs 132.56%/yr for KORU. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BULZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for KORU.
Performance
BULZ vs. KORU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 100.89% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 559.14% return.
BULZ
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- 48.46%
- YTD
- 100.89%
- 6M
- 88.97%
- 1Y
- 258.75%
- 3Y*
- 102.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KORU
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 92.47%
- YTD
- 559.14%
- 6M
- 689.29%
- 1Y
- 2,160.10%
- 3Y*
- 132.56%
- 5Y*
- 23.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.62%
BULZ vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | 100.89% | 60.09% | 54.09% | 394.22% | -92.26% | 12.62% |
KORU Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 559.14% | 432.73% | -62.18% | 28.61% | -70.16% | -21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULZ and KORU is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between BULZ and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
BULZ vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BULZ
KORU
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BULZ
KORU
Communication Services
BULZ
KORU
Consumer Cyclical
BULZ
KORU
Basic Materials
BULZ
-
KORU
Consumer Defensive
BULZ
-
KORU
Energy
BULZ
-
KORU
Financial Services
BULZ
-
KORU
Healthcare
BULZ
-
KORU
Industrials
BULZ
-
KORU
Real Estate
BULZ
-
KORU
-
Utilities
BULZ
-
KORU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULZ vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank
BULZ
KORU
BULZ vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULZ | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.72 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.81 | 35.65 | -30.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.88 | 112.99 | -100.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULZ | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51 | 17.63 | -14.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.13 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
BULZ vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, roughly equal to the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and KORU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULZ | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -95.79% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.22% | -61.39% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.96% | -73.71% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -93.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -5.39% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.42% | -57.53% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.19% | 19.33% | +0.86% |
Volatility
BULZ vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) is 22.49%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.18%. This indicates that BULZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULZ | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.49% | 60.18% | -37.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.86% | 110.71% | -53.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.35% | 124.15% | -49.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.23% | 85.11% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.23% | 79.91% | +11.32% |
BULZ vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULZ vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison
BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KORU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KORU Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 0.14% | 0.89% | 4.10% | 2.55% | 0.48% | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BULZ and KORU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KORU has higher volatility (60.18%) compared to BULZ (22.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULZ dropped -94.44% vs KORU's -95.79%.
On 3-year performance, KORU leads with 132.56% vs 102.20% for BULZ. On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BULZ has been the lower-risk option at 22.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KORU has performed better with a 132.56% return vs 102.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.
KORU has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.
BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation, while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BULZ and 1.29% for KORU.
KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.63 vs 3.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BULZ and KORU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer