BULZ vs. BRKL
BULZ (MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BULZ is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.42 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BULZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
BULZ vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BULZ
- 1D
- 10.00%
- 1M
- -9.61%
- 6M
- 24.24%
- YTD
- 25.41%
- 1Y
- 91.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.31%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37K | $14.77K | $14.77K | |
| $25.71M | $28.40M | $43.12M |
BULZ vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs | -14.59% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULZ and BRKL is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULZ vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
BULZ
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BULZ vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BULZ | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BULZ vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULZ | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -7.03% | -87.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.91% | 0.00% | -40.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.56% | -3.93% | -53.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.55% | — | — |
Volatility
BULZ vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULZ | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.84% | 30.17% | +55.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.15% | 30.17% | +61.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.15% | 30.17% | +61.98% |
BULZ vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULZ vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BULZ nor BRKL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BULZ and BRKL have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BULZ.
BULZ and BRKL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BULZ and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for BULZ and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer