BULP.L vs. SSLV.L
BULP.L (WisdomTree Gold) and SSLV.L (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - BULP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while SSLV.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BULP.L returned 12.01%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for SSLV.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BULP.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SSLV.L.
Performance
BULP.L vs. SSLV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BULP.L is traded in GBp, while SSLV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SSLV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULP.L achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than SSLV.L's 3.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BULP.L has underperformed SSLV.L with an annualized return of 12.01%, while SSLV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.
BULP.L
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 31.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.79%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
SSLV.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 28.22%
- 1Y
- 115.96%
- 3Y*
- 42.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
BULP.L vs. SSLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BULP.L WisdomTree Gold | 3.12% | 50.05% | 26.15% | 5.12% | 9.83% | -4.73% | 15.76% | 12.89% | 2.70% | 0.05% |
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 3.32% | 130.03% | 23.22% | -5.88% | 15.90% | -12.13% | 41.64% | 11.90% | -3.30% | -5.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULP.L and SSLV.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between BULP.L and SSLV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (5 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BULP.L vs. SSLV.L — Risk / Return Rank
BULP.L
SSLV.L
BULP.L vs. SSLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) and Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BULP.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.98 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 6.51 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BULP.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 2.07 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.67 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.56 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.16 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
BULP.L vs. SSLV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.90%, smaller than the maximum SSLV.L drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULP.L and SSLV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BULP.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.90% | -67.74% | +22.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.88% | -38.71% | +20.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.88% | -38.71% | +20.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.88% | -38.71% | +20.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.68% | -38.71% | +15.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.32% | -33.61% | +17.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -43.04% | +26.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 17.73% | -10.94% |
Volatility
BULP.L vs. SSLV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) is 5.11%, while Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a volatility of 16.84%. This indicates that BULP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BULP.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 16.84% | -11.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.04% | 52.73% | -32.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 55.60% | -32.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 33.88% | -17.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 30.06% | -13.83% |
BULP.L vs. SSLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BULP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLV.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BULP.L vs. SSLV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BULP.L nor SSLV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BULP.L and SSLV.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLV.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLV.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BULP.L.
BULP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while SSLV.L is Silver. BULP.L tracks Gold, while SSLV.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BULP.L and 0.19% for SSLV.L.
Find the right allocation for BULP.L and SSLV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer