PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BULP.L vs. AIGP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) and WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BULP.L is traded in GBp, while AIGP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AIGP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULP.L achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than AIGP.L's 4.78% return. Over the past 10 years, BULP.L has underperformed AIGP.L with an annualized return of 12.01%, while AIGP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.


BULP.L

1D
0.71%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
3.12%
6M
4.39%
1Y
31.07%
3Y*
25.79%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
12.01%

AIGP.L

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
4.78%
6M
11.69%
1Y
49.80%
3Y*
30.16%
5Y*
18.97%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BULP.L
WisdomTree Gold
3.12%50.05%26.15%5.12%9.83%-4.73%15.76%12.89%2.70%0.05%
AIGP.L
WisdomTree Precious Metals
4.78%65.90%25.41%2.42%10.92%-6.87%20.42%11.65%0.94%-1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BULP.L and AIGP.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007

0.73

The correlation between BULP.L and AIGP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULP.L
BULP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BULP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BULP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BULP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BULP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BULP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

AIGP.L
AIGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
AIGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) and WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BULP.LAIGP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.36

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

6.08

-1.51

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the AIGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULP.L and AIGP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BULP.LAIGP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.67

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

1.08

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.76

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.56

+0.01

Drawdowns

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.90%, smaller than the maximum AIGP.L drawdown of -51.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULP.L and AIGP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BULP.LAIGP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.90%

-51.55%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.88%

-21.00%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.88%

-21.00%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.88%

-21.00%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.68%

-23.05%

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.32%

-18.42%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-19.70%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

8.17%

-1.38%

Volatility

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Gold (BULP.L) is 5.11%, while WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that BULP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BULP.LAIGP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

7.75%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

26.85%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

29.66%

-6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

21.10%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

20.20%

-3.97%

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BULP.L and AIGP.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

BULP.L vs. AIGP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BULP.L nor AIGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BULP.L and AIGP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BULP.L and AIGP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

BULP.L tracks Gold, while AIGP.L tracks Bloomberg Precious Metals.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BULP.L and AIGP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer