PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BULIX vs. TWCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BULIX vs. TWCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX) and American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULIX achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than TWCGX's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, BULIX has underperformed TWCGX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while TWCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.03% annualized return.


BULIX

1D
1.70%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
4.40%
6M
2.91%
1Y
10.79%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
6.86%

TWCGX

1D
-0.51%
1M
7.77%
YTD
8.57%
6M
7.58%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
17.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULIX vs. TWCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BULIX
American Century Utilities Fund
4.40%16.76%24.32%-7.51%-4.37%13.77%-2.38%19.94%1.82%0.59%
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
8.57%15.28%26.20%43.31%-31.39%27.86%35.23%35.39%-1.27%30.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BULIX and TWCGX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1993

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between BULIX and TWCGX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BULIX vs. TWCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BULIX
BULIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BULIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BULIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BULIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BULIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BULIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TWCGX
TWCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
TWCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TWCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BULIX vs. TWCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX) and American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BULIXTWCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.66

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

5.50

-2.40

BULIX vs. TWCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the TWCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULIX and TWCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BULIXTWCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.76

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.62

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.80

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.53

-0.08

Drawdowns

BULIX vs. TWCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULIX drawdown since its inception was -55.21%, smaller than the maximum TWCGX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULIX and TWCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BULIXTWCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.21%

-59.60%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-16.69%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-24.20%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

-34.92%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.86%

-34.92%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-0.51%

-6.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-15.30%

+5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

5.01%

-1.40%

Volatility

BULIX vs. TWCGX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to American Century Growth Fund (TWCGX) at 3.44%. This indicates that BULIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BULIXTWCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

3.44%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

11.92%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

15.72%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

21.59%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

21.31%

-3.26%

BULIX vs. TWCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BULIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TWCGX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

BULIX vs. TWCGX - Dividend Comparison

BULIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.93%, less than TWCGX's 15.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BULIX
American Century Utilities Fund
10.93%11.60%2.36%2.65%7.78%7.50%7.55%2.97%6.91%7.70%6.99%5.87%
TWCGX
American Century Growth Fund
15.79%17.14%5.96%4.81%4.86%9.83%5.33%5.60%14.07%10.28%4.64%6.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


BULIX and TWCGX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BULIX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to TWCGX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BULIX dropped -55.21% vs TWCGX's -59.60%.

TWCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BULIX and TWCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer