PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BULG vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BULG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BULL Daily ETF (BULG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULG achieves a -56.19% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 562.84% return.


BULG

1D
-10.40%
1M
-35.04%
YTD
-56.19%
6M
-70.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
9.00%
1M
30.35%
YTD
562.84%
6M
362.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BULG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BULG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BULL Daily ETF
-56.19%-15.67%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
562.84%5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BULG and LINT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BULG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BULL Daily ETF (BULG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BULG vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BULGLINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.83

24.05

-24.88

Drawdowns

BULG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULG drawdown since its inception was -94.15%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULG and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BULGLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.15%

-49.54%

-44.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.64%

-26.55%

-65.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.49%

-20.51%

-48.98%

Volatility

BULG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BULGLINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.93%

163.04%

-49.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.93%

163.04%

-49.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.93%

163.04%

-49.11%

BULG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BULG has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

BULG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

BULG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BULG and LINT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BULG is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BULG is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BULG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for BULG and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BULG and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer