PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUIGX vs. HRSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUIGX vs. HRSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) and Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUIGX achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than HRSTX's 6.19% return.


BUIGX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.34%
6M
5.56%
YTD
6.88%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
12.61%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.37%

HRSTX

1D
0.36%
1M
0.38%
6M
6.11%
YTD
6.19%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
5.60%
ALL TIME*
0.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BUIGX vs. HRSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUIGX
Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund
6.88%11.51%15.54%19.05%-9.88%12.51%10.57%17.71%-2.19%11.41%
HRSTX
Rational Tactical Return Fund
6.19%3.66%3.23%5.06%5.90%3.95%2.65%8.35%9.66%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BUIGX and HRSTX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.21

Over the past year, BUIGX and HRSTX have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUIGX vs. HRSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUIGX
BUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HRSTX
HRSTX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HRSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HRSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUIGX vs. HRSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) and Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUIGXHRSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.48

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

12.34

+0.49

BUIGX vs. HRSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the HRSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUIGX and HRSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUIGX vs. HRSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUIGX drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, smaller than the maximum HRSTX drawdown of -69.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUIGX and HRSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUIGXHRSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.01%

-69.69%

+47.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-3.09%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

-3.09%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.22%

-3.09%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-8.51%

+8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-31.40%

+29.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.62%

+0.42%

Volatility

BUIGX vs. HRSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) is 1.99%, while Rational Tactical Return Fund (HRSTX) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that BUIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUIGXHRSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

2.90%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

5.80%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.38%

5.85%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.59%

3.93%

+7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.64%

7.09%

+4.55%

BUIGX vs. HRSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUIGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HRSTX's 1.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUIGX vs. HRSTX - Dividend Comparison

BUIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HRSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUIGX
Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.32%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HRSTX
Rational Tactical Return Fund
9.99%6.72%4.47%5.60%2.24%3.75%2.10%3.36%1.33%5.55%13.80%4.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUIGX and HRSTX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRSTX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to BUIGX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUIGX dropped -22.01% vs HRSTX's -69.69%.

BUIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUIGX and HRSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer