BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L
BUGG.L (Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and DGIT.L (iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Global X and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUGG.L returned 11.95%/yr vs 11.13%/yr for DGIT.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUGG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DGIT.L.
Performance
BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BUGG.L is traded in GBP, while DGIT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DGIT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUGG.L achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly higher than DGIT.L's -1.53% return.
BUGG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- -3.92%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGIT.L
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- -4.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.13%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- —
BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUGG.L Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 14.22% | -11.39% | 11.20% | 36.05% | -27.09% | -30.50% |
DGIT.L iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc | -1.53% | -2.47% | 24.03% | 25.52% | -28.82% | -8.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUGG.L and DGIT.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BUGG.L and DGIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
BUGG.L
DGIT.L
BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) and iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUGG.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | -0.18 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | -0.38 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUGG.L drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, which is greater than DGIT.L's maximum drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUGG.L and DGIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUGG.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -37.95% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.02% | -22.83% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.14% | -24.88% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.41% | -12.15% | -10.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.48% | -13.47% | -20.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.09% | 10.71% | +6.38% |
Volatility
BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGIT.L) at 5.91%. This indicates that BUGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUGG.L | DGIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.65% | 5.91% | +6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.98% | 13.68% | +13.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.31% | 16.63% | +13.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 23.68% | +5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 22.95% | +6.64% |
BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUGG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DGIT.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUGG.L vs. DGIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUGG.L nor DGIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BUGG.L and DGIT.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGIT.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGIT.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUGG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUGG.L and 0.40% for DGIT.L.
Find the right allocation for BUGG.L and DGIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer