BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L
BUGG.L (Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and CLO6.L (Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Global X tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BUGG.L returned 12.51%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for CLO6.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUGG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CLO6.L.
Performance
BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUGG.L achieves a 18.95% return, which is significantly higher than CLO6.L's 10.85% return.
BUGG.L
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 18.95%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLO6.L
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 13.77%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 9.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUGG.L Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 18.95% | -11.39% | 11.20% | 36.05% | -27.30% | -5.56% |
CLO6.L Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF | 10.85% | -12.30% | 7.37% | 36.74% | -34.03% | -11.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUGG.L and CLO6.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BUGG.L and CLO6.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L — Risk / Return Rank
BUGG.L
CLO6.L
BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) and Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUGG.L | CLO6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.09 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 0.32 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | 0.76 | -0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUGG.L | CLO6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 0.32 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.16 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUGG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum CLO6.L drawdown of -45.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUGG.L and CLO6.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUGG.L | CLO6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -45.50% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.02% | -27.75% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.14% | -37.31% | -2.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.67% | -19.62% | +12.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.07% | -30.99% | +15.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.98% | 11.89% | +5.09% |
Volatility
BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BUGG.L) has a higher volatility of 14.26% compared to Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (CLO6.L) at 11.40%. This indicates that BUGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLO6.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUGG.L | CLO6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.26% | 11.40% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 24.80% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.70% | 28.17% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 28.55% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 28.55% | +1.80% |
BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUGG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CLO6.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUGG.L vs. CLO6.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUGG.L nor CLO6.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BUGG.L and CLO6.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUGG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUGG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CLO6.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUGG.L and 0.55% for CLO6.L.
Find the right allocation for BUGG.L and CLO6.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer