BUG vs. XT
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 6.86%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for XT. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
BUG vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BUG having a 20.72% return and XT slightly lower at 20.20%.
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
BUG vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.20% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and XT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.73 |
The correlation between BUG and XT shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUG vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUG
XT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BUG
XT
Communication Services
BUG
XT
Consumer Cyclical
BUG
XT
Consumer Defensive
BUG
XT
Healthcare
BUG
XT
Basic Materials
BUG
-
XT
Energy
BUG
-
XT
Financial Services
BUG
-
XT
Industrials
BUG
-
XT
Real Estate
BUG
-
XT
Utilities
BUG
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
XT
BUG vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUG | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.48 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 4.41 | -4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 18.51 | -18.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUG | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 2.89 | -2.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.41 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.66 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
BUG vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -34.41% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | -10.45% | -27.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -22.09% | -15.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -34.41% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -0.47% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -7.41% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 2.49% | +15.87% |
Volatility
BUG vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | 4.85% | +9.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | 11.94% | +13.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.78% | 15.99% | +14.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 20.76% | +7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.33% | 20.08% | +9.25% |
BUG vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and XT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 5-year performance, XT leads with 8.42% vs 6.86% for BUG. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 8.42% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer