BUG vs. XOM
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 5.10%/yr vs 23.83%/yr for XOM. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BUG vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 27.80% return.
BUG
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- -4.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- —
XOM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 27.80%
- 6M
- 32.61%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
BUG vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 14.02% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 27.80% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and XOM is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.09 |
The correlation between BUG and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
XOM
BUG vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.34 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 3.21 | -3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 8.97 | -9.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 2.07 | -2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.90 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BUG vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -62.40% | +20.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | -15.69% | -22.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -18.92% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -20.51% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.91% | -10.90% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -10.20% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.38% | 5.61% | +12.77% |
Volatility
BUG vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 14.65% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 9.20%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.65% | 9.20% | +5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.06% | 20.29% | +5.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.04% | 24.44% | +6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.51% | 26.73% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.34% | 28.19% | +1.15% |
Dividends
BUG vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than XOM's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.69% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and XOM have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to XOM (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer