PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUG vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUG vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.


BUG

1D
-4.04%
1M
33.08%
YTD
20.72%
6M
15.17%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*

CHPS

1D
1.86%
1M
32.32%
YTD
107.97%
6M
109.04%
1Y
223.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUG vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
20.72%-5.04%9.59%20.64%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
107.97%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BUG and CHPS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023

0.45

The correlation between BUG and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUG vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUG
CHPS

Technology

99.9%
98.8%

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

BUG
99.9%
CHPS
98.8%

Communication Services

BUG
0.0%
CHPS

-

Consumer Cyclical

BUG
0.0%
CHPS

-

Consumer Defensive

BUG
0.0%
CHPS

-

Healthcare

BUG
0.0%
CHPS

-

Basic Materials

BUG

-

CHPS

-

Energy

BUG

-

CHPS
0.5%

Financial Services

BUG

-

CHPS
0.2%

Industrials

BUG

-

CHPS
0.4%

Real Estate

BUG

-

CHPS

-

Utilities

BUG

-

CHPS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUG vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUG
BUG Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUG Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUG vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUGCHPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.81

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

12.87

-12.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.16

49.99

-49.83

BUG vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUG and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUGCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

6.54

-6.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

1.81

-1.31

Drawdowns

BUG vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and CHPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUGCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.66%

-39.44%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.69%

-17.50%

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

0.00%

-4.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.42%

-9.16%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.36%

4.50%

+13.86%

Volatility

BUG vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) have volatilities of 14.07% and 14.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUGCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.07%

14.18%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.81%

28.19%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.78%

34.43%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.47%

33.78%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.33%

33.78%

-4.45%

BUG vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUG vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than CHPS's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
0.03%0.04%0.09%0.10%1.56%0.66%0.46%0.24%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.32%0.68%1.75%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUG and CHPS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to BUG (14.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 2.89% for BUG. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BUG has been the lower-risk option at 14.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.

BUG is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.15% for CHPS.

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUG and CHPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer