BUFZ vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BUFZ (FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFZ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). BUFZ is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, BUFZ returned 12.36% vs 93.05% for SBIT. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BUFZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

BUFZ vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFZ achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 35.42% return.

BUFZ

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: 5.23%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 1Y: 12.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.80%

SBIT

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: -8.74%
• 6M: 12.84%
• YTD: 35.42%
• 1Y: 93.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -43.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	$5.64M	$4.23M	$4.47M
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$30.10M	$32.07M	$46.36M

BUFZ vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	6.26%	11.05%	7.47%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	35.42%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFZ and SBIT is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.41

Return for Risk

BUFZ vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUFZ

BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 91
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 45
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUFZ vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUFZ	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.06	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	1.78	+1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.21	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	1.95	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.57	4.30	+14.26

BUFZ vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFZ and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUFZ vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFZ drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFZ and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFZ	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-91.35%	+81.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.51%	-47.94%	+44.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-78.51%	+78.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.63%	-69.09%	+68.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	21.71%	-21.04%

Volatility

BUFZ vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) is 1.55%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 17.65%. This indicates that BUFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFZ	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.55%	17.65%	-16.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.32%	67.17%	-62.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.29%	88.67%	-83.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.22%	96.04%	-88.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.22%	96.04%	-88.82%

BUFZ vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFZ vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

BUFZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	5.09%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFZ and SBIT in my portfolio?

BUFZ and SBIT have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFZ or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (17.65%) compared to BUFZ (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFZ dropped -10.14% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, BUFZ or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 93.05% vs 12.36% for BUFZ. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BUFZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUFZ or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 93.05% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFZ or SBIT?

SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BUFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFZ or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.00% for BUFZ.

What is the main difference between BUFZ and SBIT?

BUFZ is categorized as Options Trading, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for BUFZ and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.