BUFZ vs. PRXV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BUFZ (FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFZ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while PRXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Praxis. Both are actively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BUFZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.

Performance

BUFZ vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BUFZ

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 5.28%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 1Y: 12.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.72%

PRXV

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	$5.59M	$4.28M	$4.46M
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	$979.94K	$510.04K	$263.55K

BUFZ vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	3.00%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	8.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFZ and PRXV is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026	0.43

Return for Risk

BUFZ vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUFZ

BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 89
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PRXV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUFZ vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUFZ	PRXV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.09	—	—

Drawdowns

BUFZ vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFZ drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFZ and PRXV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFZ	PRXV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-1.41%	-8.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.24%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.63%	-0.39%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUFZ	PRXV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.31%	10.08%	-4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.22%	10.08%	-2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.22%	10.08%	-2.86%

BUFZ vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFZ vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison

BUFZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	0.00%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFZ and PRXV in my portfolio?

BUFZ and PRXV have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUFZ or PRXV?

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUFZ or PRXV?

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BUFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUFZ or PRXV?

PRXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for BUFZ.

What is the main difference between BUFZ and PRXV?

BUFZ is categorized as Options Trading, while PRXV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for BUFZ and 0.36% for PRXV.