BUFZ vs. HOCT
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT).
BUFZ and HOCT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUFZ is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Oct 25, 2023. HOCT is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Sep 29, 2023.
Performance
BUFZ vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUFZ vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF | -1.65% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
BUFZ
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 11.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUFZ vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BUFZ vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
BUFZ
HOCT
BUFZ vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFZ | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFZ | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | — | — |
Dividends
BUFZ vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUFZ nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BUFZ vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFZ drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFZ and HOCT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFZ | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | 0.00% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | 0.00% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | 0.00% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility
BUFZ vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUFZ | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 0.00% | +9.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 0.00% | +7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 0.00% | +7.50% |