PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFZ vs. DOGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFZ vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFZ vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BUFZ
FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF
-0.98%11.05%11.48%8.75%
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
6.85%19.43%-2.58%15.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFZ achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 6.85% return.


BUFZ

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.43%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DOGG

1D
0.51%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
6.85%
6M
13.65%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFZ vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFZ vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFZ
BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFZ vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFZDOGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.11

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

1.55

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.62

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.89

5.13

+4.76

BUFZ vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFZ and DOGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFZDOGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.11

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

0.95

+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between BUFZ and DOGG is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BUFZ vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

BUFZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%.


TTM202520242023
BUFZ
FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.53%8.75%9.92%5.89%

Drawdowns

BUFZ vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFZ drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, smaller than the maximum DOGG drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFZ and DOGG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFZDOGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-11.19%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-8.51%

+1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-6.08%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-2.98%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

3.01%

-1.79%

Volatility

BUFZ vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) is 2.81%, while FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that BUFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFZDOGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.19%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

7.72%

-3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.49%

12.83%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

13.01%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

13.01%

-5.51%