PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFSX vs. WMKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFSX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFSX achieves a 17.29% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 20.89% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFSX has underperformed WMKSX with an annualized return of 11.65%, while WMKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.


BUFSX

1D
0.64%
1M
5.44%
YTD
17.29%
6M
14.60%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
-3.61%
10Y*
11.65%

WMKSX

1D
0.17%
1M
5.31%
YTD
20.89%
6M
18.78%
1Y
35.88%
3Y*
25.78%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
14.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFSX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
17.29%-0.13%5.38%5.45%-30.01%4.44%66.49%40.97%-5.73%26.96%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
20.89%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%20.32%-13.92%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFSX and WMKSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 1998

0.84

The correlation between BUFSX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFSX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFSX
BUFSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BUFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFSX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFSXWMKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

4.43

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

14.85

-8.73

BUFSX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFSX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFSX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFSX drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, smaller than the maximum WMKSX drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFSX and WMKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFSXWMKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.24%

-64.09%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-8.50%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-24.20%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.57%

-39.84%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.74%

-39.84%

-6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.11%

0.00%

-20.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-15.66%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

2.53%

+1.53%

Volatility

BUFSX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.52%. This indicates that BUFSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFSXWMKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

4.52%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

12.32%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

17.93%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.60%

26.13%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.63%

23.99%

+0.64%

BUFSX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFSX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFSX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

BUFSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.53%9.01%9.14%31.02%30.30%25.19%70.18%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
18.95%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BUFSX and WMKSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BUFSX has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to WMKSX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFSX dropped -53.24% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

WMKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFSX and WMKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer