BUFSX vs. FDG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BUFSX (Buffalo Small Cap Fund) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both funds - BUFSX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Buffalo, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Over the past 5 years, BUFSX returned -3.69%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for FDG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFSX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.

Performance

BUFSX vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFSX achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's 9.71% return.

BUFSX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 20.32%
• 3Y*: 5.93%
• 5Y*: -3.69%
• 10Y*: 10.70%

FDG

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 6M: 12.54%
• 1Y: 34.58%
• 3Y*: 30.14%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFSX vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BUFSX Buffalo Small Cap Fund	11.57%	-0.13%	5.38%	5.45%	-30.01%	4.44%	120.58%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	9.71%	22.13%	45.89%	37.22%	-35.74%	8.52%	93.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFSX and FDG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020	0.79

The correlation between BUFSX and FDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BUFSX vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFSX

BUFSX Risk / Return Rank: 15
BUFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BUFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BUFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BUFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
BUFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 52
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFSX vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFSX	FDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.97	-0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.62	-0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.34	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	2.30	-0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	8.14	-3.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFSX vs. FDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the FDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFSX and FDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFSX	FDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	1.97	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	0.55	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.94	-0.47

Drawdowns

BUFSX vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFSX drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, which is greater than FDG's maximum drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFSX and FDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFSX	FDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.24%	-43.69%	-9.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.92%	-15.71%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-26.14%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.57%	-43.69%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.01%	-1.16%	-22.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.91%	-13.44%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	4.44%	-0.39%

Volatility

BUFSX vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) at 4.66%. This indicates that BUFSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFSX	FDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	4.66%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.65%	13.88%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.97%	17.68%	+1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.49%	24.67%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.57%	24.89%	-0.32%

BUFSX vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFSX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFSX vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFSX nor FDG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUFSX Buffalo Small Cap Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.53%	9.01%	9.14%	31.02%	30.30%	25.19%	70.18%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFSX and FDG in my portfolio?

BUFSX and FDG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFSX or FDG?

BUFSX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to FDG (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFSX dropped -53.24% vs FDG's -43.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.