PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFSX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFSX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFSX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than FECGX's 18.46% return.


BUFSX

1D
1.15%
1M
5.14%
YTD
12.85%
6M
11.50%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
6.33%
5Y*
-3.30%
10Y*
10.83%

FECGX

1D
0.87%
1M
5.85%
YTD
18.46%
6M
16.79%
1Y
39.39%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFSX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
12.85%-0.13%5.38%5.45%-30.01%4.44%66.49%7.84%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
18.46%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFSX and FECGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.95

The correlation between BUFSX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFSX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFSX
BUFSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BUFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFSX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFSXFECGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.96

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

2.68

-0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

2.83

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

10.20

-4.82

BUFSX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFSX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFSXFECGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.96

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.25

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.39

+0.07

Drawdowns

BUFSX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFSX drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFSX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFSXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.24%

-41.85%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-14.81%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-28.45%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.57%

-40.34%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.13%

0.00%

-23.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-15.76%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

4.10%

-0.05%

Volatility

BUFSX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) is 5.20%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that BUFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFSXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

6.44%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

15.86%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

21.35%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.50%

24.54%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

27.19%

-2.62%

BUFSX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFSX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFSX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

BUFSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.53%9.01%9.14%31.02%30.30%25.19%70.18%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BUFSX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FECGX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to BUFSX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFSX dropped -53.24% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

FECGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFSX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer