PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFSX vs. ALFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFSX vs. ALFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFSX achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than ALFAX's 16.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BUFSX having a 10.02% annualized return and ALFAX not far behind at 9.86%.


BUFSX

1D
2.74%
1M
-5.34%
6M
6.60%
YTD
10.90%
1Y
15.81%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-4.20%
10Y*
10.02%
ALL TIME*
10.56%

ALFAX

1D
2.30%
1M
-3.29%
6M
10.34%
YTD
16.01%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
9.86%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BUFSX vs. ALFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
10.90%-0.13%5.38%5.45%-30.01%4.44%66.49%40.97%-5.73%26.96%
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
16.01%8.80%13.18%13.92%-23.50%15.01%26.16%24.95%-9.72%20.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFSX and ALFAX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 1998

0.89

The correlation between BUFSX and ALFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFSX vs. ALFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUFSX
BUFSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BUFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ALFAX
ALFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ALFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ALFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUFSX vs. ALFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) and Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFSXALFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.22

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

2.23

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

7.61

-4.83

BUFSX vs. ALFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ALFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFSX and ALFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFSX vs. ALFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFSX drawdown since its inception was -53.24%, smaller than the maximum ALFAX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFSX and ALFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFSXALFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.24%

-57.11%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-10.31%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-25.01%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.57%

-33.88%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.74%

-40.29%

-6.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.46%

-5.78%

-18.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-12.81%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.01%

+1.37%

Volatility

BUFSX vs. ALFAX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo Small Cap Fund (BUFSX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) at 5.58%. This indicates that BUFSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFSXALFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

5.58%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.33%

14.96%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.27%

18.49%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

20.03%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.59%

20.75%

+3.84%

BUFSX vs. ALFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFSX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ALFAX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFSX vs. ALFAX - Dividend Comparison

BUFSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
4.57%5.30%0.80%0.46%6.94%5.38%7.99%14.66%16.61%11.96%11.85%15.83%
BUFSX
Buffalo Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.53%9.01%9.14%31.02%30.30%25.19%70.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BUFSX and ALFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BUFSX has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to ALFAX (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFSX dropped -53.24% vs ALFAX's -57.11%.

ALFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFSX and ALFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer