PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFR vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFR vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFR achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 28.74% return.


BUFR

1D
0.19%
1M
2.10%
YTD
6.63%
6M
7.31%
1Y
17.88%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*

TDIV

1D
-1.40%
1M
12.56%
YTD
28.74%
6M
26.30%
1Y
50.88%
3Y*
33.15%
5Y*
18.96%
10Y*
19.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFR vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
6.63%12.44%14.68%19.63%-7.57%11.88%7.57%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
28.74%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%13.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFR and TDIV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2020

0.84

The correlation between BUFR and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFR vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUFR
TDIV

Technology

35.8%
85.0%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.3%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

BUFR
35.8%
TDIV
85.0%

Financial Services

BUFR
11.8%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

BUFR
11.3%
TDIV
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BUFR
10.2%
TDIV

-

Healthcare

BUFR
8.4%
TDIV

-

Industrials

BUFR
7.9%
TDIV
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

BUFR
4.9%
TDIV

-

Energy

BUFR
3.5%
TDIV

-

Utilities

BUFR
2.4%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

BUFR
1.9%
TDIV

-

Basic Materials

BUFR
1.8%
TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFR vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFR
BUFR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFR vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFRTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.46

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

4.76

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.10

14.81

+6.29

BUFR vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFR Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFR and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFRTDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.77

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.92

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.87

+0.20

Drawdowns

BUFR vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFR drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFR and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFRTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-31.97%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-10.74%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-23.00%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.73%

-31.97%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-3.17%

+3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-4.84%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

3.45%

-2.60%

Volatility

BUFR vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) is 1.02%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that BUFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFRTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

7.12%

-6.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

13.98%

-9.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

18.49%

-11.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.44%

20.68%

-10.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.22%

20.85%

-10.63%

BUFR vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFR vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

BUFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.13%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFR and TDIV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to BUFR (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFR dropped -13.73% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 5-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.96% vs 10.02% for BUFR. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BUFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFR.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.00% for BUFR.

BUFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFR and 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFR and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer