PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFR vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFR vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFR achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 14.88% return.


BUFR

1D
0.41%
1M
0.60%
6M
6.43%
YTD
7.33%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.60%

TDIV

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.67%
6M
12.66%
YTD
14.88%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
24.49%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
17.01%
ALL TIME*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.72M$41.24M$45.38M
$13.49M$14.96M$15.07M

BUFR vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
7.33%12.44%14.68%19.63%-7.57%11.88%6.60%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
14.88%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFR and TDIV is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2020

0.84

The correlation between BUFR and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFR vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUFR
BUFR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUFR vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFRTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.20

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.47

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.68

4.06

+11.62

BUFR vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFR Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFR and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFR vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFR drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFR and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFRTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-31.97%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-16.34%

+11.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-23.00%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.73%

-31.97%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-13.59%

+13.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-4.92%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

5.89%

-5.01%

Volatility

BUFR vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) is 1.90%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that BUFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFRTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

5.94%

-4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.41%

16.32%

-10.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.78%

20.70%

-13.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

21.11%

-10.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.16%

20.99%

-10.83%

BUFR vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFR vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

BUFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFR
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.37%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFR and TDIV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to BUFR (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFR dropped -13.73% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 5-year performance, TDIV leads with 15.93% vs 9.76% for BUFR. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BUFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 15.93% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFR.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for BUFR.

BUFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFR and 0.50% for TDIV.

BUFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFR and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer