BUFR vs. SPY
BUFR (FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. BUFR is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUFR returned 9.98%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
BUFR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFR achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.
BUFR
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 17.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
BUFR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 6.42% | 12.44% | 14.68% | 19.63% | -7.57% | 11.88% | 7.57% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 13.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFR and SPY is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BUFR and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
BUFR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUFR
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BUFR
SPY
Financial Services
BUFR
SPY
Communication Services
BUFR
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
BUFR
SPY
Healthcare
BUFR
SPY
Industrials
BUFR
SPY
Consumer Defensive
BUFR
SPY
Energy
BUFR
SPY
Utilities
BUFR
SPY
Real Estate
BUFR
SPY
Basic Materials
BUFR
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
BUFR
SPY
BUFR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.43 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 3.16 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.78 | 14.72 | +6.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.38 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.82 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.59 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
BUFR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFR drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFR and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -55.19% | +41.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -8.88% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -18.76% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.73% | -24.50% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.70% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -9.05% | +6.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 1.91% | -1.06% |
Volatility
BUFR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR) is 1.03%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that BUFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 2.84% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 8.90% | -3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.53% | 11.83% | -5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 17.05% | -6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 17.94% | -7.71% |
BUFR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
BUFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFR FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BUFR and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to BUFR (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFR dropped -13.73% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 9.98% for BUFR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BUFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFR.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for BUFR.
BUFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFR and 0.09% for SPY.
BUFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFR and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer