PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFQ vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFQ vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFQ vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BUFQ
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
-1.45%14.03%16.41%35.51%0.75%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
-4.37%17.72%24.89%26.18%5.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFQ achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -4.37% return.


BUFQ

1D
2.67%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
1.38%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
2.91%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFQ vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFQ has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFQ vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFQ
BUFQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BUFQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFQ vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFQSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.93

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

1.45

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.53

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.41

7.30

+4.11

BUFQ vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFQ and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFQSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.93

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.56

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between BUFQ and SPY is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BUFQ vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

BUFQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFQ
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.14%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Drawdowns

BUFQ vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFQ drawdown since its inception was -15.74%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFQ and SPY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFQSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-55.19%

+39.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-12.05%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-6.24%

+3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-9.09%

+6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.52%

-0.92%

Volatility

BUFQ vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) is 4.25%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that BUFQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFQSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

5.31%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

9.47%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

19.05%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

17.06%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

17.92%

-4.36%