BUFMX vs. FAMVX
BUFMX (Buffalo Mid Cap Fund) and FAMVX (FAM Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX returned 8.84%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for FAMVX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFMX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for FAMVX.
Performance
BUFMX vs. FAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFMX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than FAMVX's 6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX has underperformed FAMVX with an annualized return of 8.84%, while FAMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.
BUFMX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -2.04%
- 1Y
- -5.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
FAMVX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 9.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
BUFMX vs. FAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund | -0.96% | -1.68% | 6.73% | 26.92% | -27.89% | 14.39% | 34.24% | 37.96% | -7.29% | 13.59% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 6.98% | 4.90% | 15.51% | 16.09% | -14.06% | 25.65% | 6.81% | 30.31% | -6.15% | 17.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFMX and FAMVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2001 | 0.87 |
The correlation between BUFMX and FAMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFMX vs. FAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
BUFMX
FAMVX
BUFMX vs. FAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFMX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.13 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 1.09 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 3.25 | -3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFMX vs. FAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFMX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than FAMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFMX and FAMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFMX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | -51.12% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.37% | -9.47% | -8.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.29% | -16.74% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.58% | -22.77% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.58% | -37.73% | +2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -0.38% | -8.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -6.42% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.75% | 3.16% | +5.59% |
Volatility
BUFMX vs. FAMVX - Volatility Comparison
Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) at 4.17%. This indicates that BUFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFMX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 4.17% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 10.67% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.70% | 13.87% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 17.17% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 18.24% | +1.53% |
BUFMX vs. FAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMVX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFMX vs. FAMVX - Dividend Comparison
BUFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than FAMVX's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund | 10.41% | 10.31% | 6.93% | 5.21% | 5.46% | 11.45% | 6.91% | 8.20% | 4.47% | 25.22% | 8.49% | 13.06% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 4.58% | 4.90% | 6.28% | 5.01% | 3.67% | 4.99% | 3.69% | 6.80% | 4.09% | 5.06% | 5.21% | 9.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFMX and FAMVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFMX has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to FAMVX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFMX dropped -58.44% vs FAMVX's -51.12%.
FAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFMX and FAMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer