PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFIX vs. FAOCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFIX vs. FAOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, BUFIX has outperformed FAOCX with an annualized return of 11.18%, while FAOCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.


BUFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
7.30%
YTD
21.21%
6M
21.62%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
11.18%

FAOCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-1.01%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFIX vs. FAOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
21.21%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%29.33%
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
0.00%14.19%3.86%19.03%-25.22%17.97%13.77%26.37%-15.77%28.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFIX and FAOCX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between BUFIX and FAOCX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFIX vs. FAOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOCX
FAOCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FAOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFIX vs. FAOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFIXFAOCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.99

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

-0.13

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

-0.21

+7.23

BUFIX vs. FAOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the FAOCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFIX and FAOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFIX vs. FAOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFIX drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, smaller than the maximum FAOCX drawdown of -60.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFIX and FAOCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFIXFAOCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-60.45%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-7.33%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-14.05%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.93%

-36.96%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

-36.96%

+2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.90%

+5.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-15.61%

+6.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

4.17%

-0.46%

Volatility

BUFIX vs. FAOCX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that BUFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFIXFAOCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

0.00%

+8.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

3.64%

+13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.84%

8.76%

+10.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

16.71%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

16.64%

+1.02%

BUFIX vs. FAOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOCX's 2.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFIX vs. FAOCX - Dividend Comparison

BUFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than FAOCX's 8.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.70%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
8.26%8.26%0.40%0.00%0.00%2.22%0.00%0.51%3.72%3.07%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFIX and FAOCX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFIX has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFIX dropped -55.09% vs FAOCX's -60.45%.

BUFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFIX and FAOCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer