PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFIX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFIX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFIX achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 24.97% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFIX has underperformed DCINX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while DCINX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


BUFIX

1D
1.26%
1M
9.49%
YTD
17.82%
6M
21.24%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
10.23%

DCINX

1D
1.16%
1M
7.70%
YTD
24.97%
6M
28.99%
1Y
52.92%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFIX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
17.82%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%29.33%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
24.97%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFIX and DCINX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2007

0.86

The correlation between BUFIX and DCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFIX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFIX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFIXDCINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

3.44

-2.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

4.38

-2.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.61

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

4.52

-2.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.83

18.19

-12.36

BUFIX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFIX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFIXDCINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

3.44

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.90

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.77

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.35

-0.01

Drawdowns

BUFIX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFIX drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, smaller than the maximum DCINX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFIX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFIXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-61.79%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-11.91%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-13.74%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.93%

-31.18%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

-37.28%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-12.85%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

2.96%

+0.72%

Volatility

BUFIX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) at 5.54%. This indicates that BUFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFIXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

5.54%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

13.44%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

15.89%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

15.39%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

16.53%

+0.99%

BUFIX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFIX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

BUFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than DCINX's 8.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.72%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.76%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFIX and DCINX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFIX has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to DCINX (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFIX dropped -55.09% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFIX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer