PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFHX vs. FHYSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFHX vs. FHYSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFHX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than FHYSX's 1.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BUFHX having a 5.35% annualized return and FHYSX not far behind at 5.30%.


BUFHX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.27%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
4.84%
10Y*
5.35%

FHYSX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
5.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFHX vs. FHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
1.70%5.11%10.35%11.68%-5.53%5.52%9.26%12.33%-2.26%5.98%
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
1.19%9.14%6.42%12.77%-13.16%4.49%6.08%15.14%-2.16%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFHX and FHYSX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2009

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between BUFHX and FHYSX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFHX vs. FHYSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFHX
BUFHX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BUFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FHYSX
FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFHX vs. FHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFHXFHYSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.52

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.89

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

15.03

-5.08

BUFHX vs. FHYSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FHYSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFHX and FHYSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFHXFHYSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.07

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.55

0.66

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.33

0.92

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.88

+0.64

Drawdowns

BUFHX vs. FHYSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFHX drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, which is greater than FHYSX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFHX and FHYSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFHXFHYSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.01%

-21.45%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.13%

-2.44%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.83%

-3.64%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.98%

-16.93%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

-21.45%

+2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.17%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-2.58%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.47%

+0.03%

Volatility

BUFHX vs. FHYSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) is 0.69%, while Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) has a volatility of 0.91%. This indicates that BUFHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFHXFHYSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.91%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.95%

2.61%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49%

3.40%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.14%

5.24%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.04%

5.77%

-1.73%

BUFHX vs. FHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFHX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFHX vs. FHYSX - Dividend Comparison

BUFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than FHYSX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFHX
Buffalo High Yield Fund
6.95%6.84%8.03%6.41%8.05%7.24%4.11%4.21%5.17%4.57%3.85%5.51%
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
6.30%6.28%5.84%5.30%5.27%4.54%5.74%6.18%6.61%6.98%6.45%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFHX and FHYSX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHYSX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to BUFHX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFHX dropped -26.01% vs FHYSX's -21.45%.

FHYSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFHX and FHYSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer