BUFH vs. NFTY
BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a India Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. BUFH is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, BUFH returned 6.34% vs -1.61% for NFTY. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BUFH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
BUFH vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -5.08% return.
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 6.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.41%
NFTY
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $330.62K | $242.47K | $193.16K | |
| $2.50M | $1.73M | $1.67M |
BUFH vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 3.19% | 3.81% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -5.08% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFH and NFTY is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFH vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
BUFH
NFTY
BUFH vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFH | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 0.99 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | -0.10 | +4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.44 | -0.23 | +19.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFH vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFH | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -47.67% | +46.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.53% | -16.14% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.23% | +13.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -9.65% | +9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 6.99% | -6.66% |
Volatility
BUFH vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) is 0.54%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that BUFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFH | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 3.57% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 12.74% | -10.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40% | 14.87% | -12.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.32% | 17.41% | -15.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.32% | 20.65% | -18.33% |
BUFH vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFH vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.87% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFH and NFTY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFTY has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to BUFH (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFH dropped -1.53% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 1-year performance, BUFH leads with 6.34% vs -1.61% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, BUFH has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUFH has performed better with a 6.34% return vs -1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFTY is India Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.80% for NFTY.
BUFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFH and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer