PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFH vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFH vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFH vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
2.45%3.89%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%35.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFH and FTXL is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFH vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFH

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFH vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFH vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFHFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.91

0.94

+1.97

Drawdowns

BUFH vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFHFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-43.87%

+42.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-10.56%

+10.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

Volatility

BUFH vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFHFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

35.94%

-33.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

36.02%

-33.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.37%

34.25%

-31.88%

BUFH vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFH vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFH and FTXL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.60% for FTXL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFH and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer