PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFH vs. DTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFH vs. DTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than DTD's 10.02% return.


BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DTD

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.79%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.93%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFH vs. DTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFH and DTD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFH vs. DTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFH

DTD
DTD Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFH vs. DTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFH vs. DTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFHDTDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.91

0.53

+2.38

Drawdowns

BUFH vs. DTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum DTD drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and DTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFHDTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-58.19%

+56.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.48%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-7.34%

+7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

BUFH vs. DTD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFHDTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

9.29%

-6.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

13.57%

-11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.37%

16.21%

-13.84%

BUFH vs. DTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DTD's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFH vs. DTD - Dividend Comparison

BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
1.87%1.99%2.07%2.43%2.62%2.04%2.73%2.50%2.93%2.36%2.66%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFH and DTD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DTD is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTD is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

DTD has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DTD is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.28% for DTD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFH and DTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer