BUFH vs. AIRR
BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
BUFH vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.81% return.
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 31.81%
- 6M
- 27.48%
- 1Y
- 63.63%
- 3Y*
- 36.68%
- 5Y*
- 25.97%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
BUFH vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.30% | 3.81% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.81% | 22.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFH and AIRR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFH vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
BUFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIRR
BUFH vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFH | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFH vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFH | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -42.37% | +40.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -2.80% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -7.47% | +7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.58% | — |
Volatility
BUFH vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFH | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38% | 26.40% | -24.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 25.45% | -23.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 26.33% | -23.95% |
BUFH vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFH vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFH and AIRR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
BUFH is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AIRR is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.69% for AIRR.
Find the right allocation for BUFH and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer