BUFGX vs. BUFMX
BUFGX (Buffalo Growth Fund) and BUFMX (Buffalo Mid Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - BUFGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Buffalo, while BUFMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Buffalo. Over the past 10 years, BUFGX returned 12.96%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for BUFMX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFGX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BUFMX.
Performance
BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFGX achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than BUFMX's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFGX has outperformed BUFMX with an annualized return of 12.96%, while BUFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.
BUFGX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 8.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
BUFMX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 1Y
- -7.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFGX Buffalo Growth Fund | 0.08% | 13.95% | 25.13% | 42.67% | -31.19% | 21.52% | 28.29% | 31.89% | 0.69% | 22.76% |
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund | -1.99% | -1.68% | 6.73% | 26.92% | -27.89% | 14.39% | 34.24% | 37.96% | -7.29% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFGX and BUFMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2001 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUFGX and BUFMX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFGX vs. BUFMX — Risk / Return Rank
BUFGX
BUFMX
BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) and Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFGX | BUFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.93 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | -0.47 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | -0.95 | +2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFGX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, smaller than the maximum BUFMX drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFGX and BUFMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFGX | BUFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.17% | -58.44% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.63% | -18.37% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.93% | -20.29% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.68% | -35.58% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.68% | -35.58% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -10.14% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.96% | -9.41% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 9.01% | -3.52% |
Volatility
BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) is 5.49%, while Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that BUFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFGX | BUFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 7.35% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 13.60% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 16.47% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 20.35% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 19.73% | +1.00% |
BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFGX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFMX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Dividend Comparison
BUFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than BUFMX's 10.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFGX Buffalo Growth Fund | 6.11% | 6.12% | 8.55% | 5.55% | 4.77% | 9.90% | 4.97% | 13.60% | 34.64% | 20.49% | 0.00% | 18.46% |
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund | 10.52% | 10.31% | 6.93% | 5.21% | 5.46% | 11.45% | 6.91% | 8.20% | 4.47% | 25.22% | 8.49% | 13.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFGX and BUFMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFMX has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to BUFGX (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFGX dropped -50.17% vs BUFMX's -58.44%.
BUFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFGX and BUFMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer