PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFGX vs. BUFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) and Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFGX achieves a -2.24% return, which is significantly lower than BUFMX's -0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFGX has outperformed BUFMX with an annualized return of 13.37%, while BUFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.84% annualized return.


BUFGX

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
-2.24%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
11.58%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
13.37%

BUFMX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.72%
YTD
-0.96%
6M
-2.04%
1Y
-5.36%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
8.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFGX
Buffalo Growth Fund
-2.24%13.95%25.13%42.67%-31.19%21.52%28.29%31.89%0.69%22.76%
BUFMX
Buffalo Mid Cap Fund
-0.96%-1.68%6.73%26.92%-27.89%14.39%34.24%37.96%-7.29%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFGX and BUFMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2001

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between BUFGX and BUFMX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFGX vs. BUFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFGX
BUFGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BUFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFMX
BUFMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BUFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) and Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFGXBUFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.97

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

-0.25

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

-0.52

+2.83

BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the BUFMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFGX and BUFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFGX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, smaller than the maximum BUFMX drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFGX and BUFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFGXBUFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.17%

-58.44%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.63%

-18.37%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.93%

-20.29%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.68%

-35.58%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

-35.58%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

-9.19%

+4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-9.40%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

8.75%

-3.39%

Volatility

BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo Growth Fund (BUFGX) and Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) have volatilities of 6.00% and 6.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFGXBUFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

6.01%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

12.69%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

15.70%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

20.23%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

19.77%

+1.01%

BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFGX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFMX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFGX vs. BUFMX - Dividend Comparison

BUFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than BUFMX's 10.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFGX
Buffalo Growth Fund
6.26%6.12%8.55%5.55%4.77%9.90%4.97%13.60%34.64%20.49%0.00%18.46%
BUFMX
Buffalo Mid Cap Fund
10.41%10.31%6.93%5.21%5.46%11.45%6.91%8.20%4.47%25.22%8.49%13.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFGX and BUFMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFMX has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to BUFGX (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFGX dropped -50.17% vs BUFMX's -58.44%.

BUFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFGX and BUFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer