BTRN vs. YBTC
BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTRN is passively managed, while YBTC is actively managed. Over the past year, BTRN returned -18.31% vs -36.84% for YBTC. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
BTRN vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -25.51% return.
BTRN
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- -18.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -19.76%
- YTD
- -25.51%
- 6M
- -28.64%
- 1Y
- -36.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.29% | 4.89% | 5.22% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -25.51% | -4.23% | 28.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTRN and YBTC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between BTRN and YBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTRN vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
BTRN
YBTC
BTRN vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTRN | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.78 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -1.43 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTRN | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | -0.94 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.13 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
BTRN vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum YBTC drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTRN | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -47.09% | +10.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | -47.09% | +21.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.29% | -45.60% | +20.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -12.94% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.68% | 25.85% | -11.17% |
Volatility
BTRN vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) is 7.24%, while Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that BTRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTRN | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | 8.73% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 31.30% | -20.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 39.25% | -19.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 40.82% | -9.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 40.82% | -9.86% |
BTRN vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BTRN and YBTC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
BTRN vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.60%, less than YBTC's 90.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.60% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 90.64% | 76.04% | 44.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTRN and YBTC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YBTC has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to BTRN (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTRN dropped -36.97% vs YBTC's -47.09%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -18.31% vs -36.84% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 7.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -18.31% return vs -36.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTRN and YBTC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 90.64%, compared with 30.60% for BTRN.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill.
BTRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.93 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTRN and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer