BTRN vs. SETH

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BTRN tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index while SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BTRN returned -22.57% vs 32.96% for SETH. Their -0.60 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

BTRN vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -10.38% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 28.99% return.

BTRN

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.18%
• 6M: -9.55%
• YTD: -10.38%
• 1Y: -22.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.25%

SETH

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -10.40%
• 6M: 4.15%
• YTD: 28.99%
• 1Y: 32.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -31.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	$6.41K	$4.49K	$41.74K
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	$1.05M	$1.13M	$1.85M

BTRN vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	-10.38%	4.89%	3.25%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	28.99%	-29.41%	-21.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BTRN and SETH is -0.61, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	-0.60

The correlation between BTRN and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.61 to -0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTRN vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTRN

BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 1
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 25
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTRN vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTRN	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.37	0.50	-1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.85	1.10	-2.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.13	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	1.11	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	1.91	-3.22

BTRN vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTRN Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTRN and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTRN vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTRN	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.97%	-80.74%	+43.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.73%	-29.71%	+3.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.19%	-64.57%	+38.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.20%	-55.13%	+39.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.20%	17.31%	-0.11%

Volatility

BTRN vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) is 2.68%, while ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that BTRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTRN	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	11.35%	-8.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	43.88%	-34.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.62%	66.92%	-50.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.91%	68.79%	-38.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.91%	68.79%	-38.88%

BTRN vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BTRN and SETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

BTRN vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.32%, more than SETH's 22.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	31.32%	27.76%	2.56%	0.00%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	22.19%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTRN and SETH in my portfolio?

BTRN and SETH have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTRN or SETH?

SETH has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to BTRN (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTRN dropped -36.97% vs SETH's -80.74%.

Which ETF is better, BTRN or SETH?

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 32.96% vs -22.57% for BTRN. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTRN or SETH?

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 32.96% return vs -22.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTRN or SETH?

BTRN and SETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTRN or SETH?

BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.32%, compared with 22.19% for SETH.

What is the main difference between BTRN and SETH?

BTRN tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index, while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.