BTRN vs. MSBT
BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BTRN tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
BTRN vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTRN
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- -18.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -7.95% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTRN and MSBT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTRN vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
BTRN
MSBT
BTRN vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTRN | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTRN | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -1.33 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
BTRN vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTRN | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -20.25% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.29% | -20.25% | -5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -3.91% | -10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.68% | — | — |
Volatility
BTRN vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTRN | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 32.92% | -13.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 32.92% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 32.92% | -1.96% |
BTRN vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTRN vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.60%, while MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.60% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BTRN and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.60%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
BTRN tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTRN and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for BTRN and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer