BTRN vs. CBOO
BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BTRN is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. BTRN is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
BTRN vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -9.20% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.02% return.
BTRN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- 1Y
- -17.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.20% | -12.10% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.02% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTRN and CBOO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTRN vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
BTRN
CBOO
BTRN vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTRN | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTRN | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -1.17 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
BTRN vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTRN | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -2.34% | -34.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.22% | -1.70% | -23.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.43% | -1.61% | -12.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.76% | — | — |
Volatility
BTRN vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTRN | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 2.14% | +17.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.94% | 2.14% | +28.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.94% | 2.14% | +28.80% |
BTRN vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTRN vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.57%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTRN and CBOO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.57%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
BTRN is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTRN and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for BTRN and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer